NEWSLETTERS
In this Section...
Current Newsletter
Important Topics
Online Forms
Helpful Links and Information
Seminar Schedule
Past Issues ...
> Spring 2006
> Summer 2005
> Spring 2005
> Summer 2004
> Spring 2004
> Fall 2003
> Summer 2003
> Spring 2003
> Fall 2002
> Summer 2002
> Fall 2001
> Summer 2001
> Spring 2001
> Fall 2000
> Spring 2000
> Fall 1999
> Spring 1999
> Fall 1998
> Spring 1998

Past Issues - Summer 2005

Printer Friendly Version


2005 Legislative Preview

The 2005 Legislature more than made up for the failure of the 2004 session to produce much legislation affecting the construction industry. Due to space limitations we are providing the highlights of these bills. At press time many of these bills have not been taken up by the Governor so they are subject to veto. The full text of the bills can be found at http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Welcome/index.cfm.

To Top


House Bill 509 - Prompt Payment Act

The Florida Local Government Prompt Payment Act was revised and a similar one created for state projects. It addresses withholding and release of retainage, creation and completion of a final punchlist, and time periods within which final payment m ust be made.

One of its primary features is to put an end to the "rolling" punchlist. A single punchlist must be generated and payment made on completion of the single punchlist. Any deficiencies discovered after the punchlist is prepared become warranty items. It also shortens the time for contractors to make downstream payments from 15 days to 10 days from receipt of payment and subcontractors must pay downstream within 7 days. If money is not to be paid to a subcontractor, it must be held by the public owner and not the contractor. Retainage will be 10% until 50% completion after that 5% can be withheld. After 50% completion the contractor may withhold retainage from specific subcontractors at a rate higher than 5% only for a good cause, on a case-by-case basis. Public owners may not hold retainage to secure a warranty.

Download House Bill 509 PDF

To Top


Senate Bill 442 - Florida Building Code and Private Plan Review and Inspection Services

This is an 85-page bill addressing a number of issues. Among other changes are:

•  The Florida Building Code, 2004 edition, becomes effective October 1, 2005.

•  It is a disciplinary violation for a building code administrator, engineer or registered architect to perform inspections without the necessary insurance.

•  Cities and counties are barred from imposing additional requirements on certified electrical contractors.

•  Sets procedures for binding review of code interpretations by local building officials.

•  Private providers of code inspection services are no longer required to have general liability insurance, but professional liability coverage requirements are increased.

•  Restricts ability of local building officials to obstruct the use of a private provider of inspections.

•  Requires posting of contact information for the private provider with a description of the services.

•  Private inspectors must be em ployees of the provider.

•  The audit procedures by local officials of private providers is changed from required to permissive.

•  Work may now proceed after an inspection by a private provider and may not be delayed for completion of an audit inspection by building officials. Building officials have tried to limit the use of private providers by auditing all inspections. W ork had to be held open until the audit was completed.

•  Forbids use of building code fees for activities not related to review and inspection.

Download Senate Bill 442 PDF

To Top


House Bill 113 - Construction Liens and Bonds

For the first time in several years, the legislature has made changes to the lien and bond laws. These changes are generally as follows:

•  Amends Section 255.05 to forbid bonds that restrict claims from any of the claimants defined in Section 713.01 nor may the bond restrict the venue of any action under the bond.

•  Amends Section 713.05 which requires that an explanation of the lien law be provided in any contract between an owner and a contractor for up to four residential units. The explanation may now be in 14 point type (down from 18 point) and must be on the front page of the contract. There are also changes in the wording of the explanation. Clarifies that the failure to provide the explanation does not affect the rights of lienors who are not in privity with the owner.

•  Amends Section 713.02 to make it clear that the absence of a license by a contractor, subcontractor or sub-subcontractor does not affect anyone else's rights to lien or contract claims. It prohibits a surety from defending claims on the basis that its principal was not properly licensed.

•  Section 713.04, regarding subdivision improvements, now requires a Final Contractors Affidavit. Without it the final payment is an improper payment.

•  The procedure for using a payment bond issued under section 713.23, but not recorded with the Notice of Commencement has been clarified. 713.23 allows the unrecorded bond to be used as a transfer bond. This implied that the bond transfer procedures of 712.24 were to be followed to effect the transfer of the bond. Now the Notice of Bond pursuant to 713.23(2) is to be used to make the transfer. Time limits for serving notices are changed to the later of the time specified in 713.23 or the date the Notice of Bond is served on the lienor.

•  Section 713.23 relating to Notice of Contest of Claim Against Payment Bond makes it clear that such a notice can be served at any time after a Notice of Nonpayment has been served.

•  For suits on lien and bond claims, there was a question about the jurisdiction of county courts in these matters. It is now clear that county courts share jurisdiction with the circuit courts for claims below $15,000.00.

•  Less than 713.24 where a suit to enforce a lien has been tim ely filed and during the suit the lien is transferred to a bond, an action commenced within one year after the transfer shall be deemed filed as of the date of filing of the suit to enforce the lien. The exception is where there is a Notice of Contest of Bond.

•  Increases penalties for misapplication of funds. Misapplication of a total value of $1,000, but less than $100,000, is a second degree felony. Previously the range for a second degree felony was $20,000 to $100,000. Less than $1,000 is a third degree felony.

•  Section 713.3471 sets forth the lender's responsibilities when disbursing construction loans. The lender was required to provide a warning regarding the need for lien releases every time a disbursement was made. This requirement is now restricted to residential real property owned by a natural person. It also permits delivery of the warning by mail, e-mail or facsimile.

Download House Bill 113 PDF

To Top


House Bill 315 - Regulation of Home Inspectors, Mold Remediators, and Mold Assessors

This bill creates standards for residential home inspectors. Certain educational and examination requirements must be met to perform this service. It also requires continuing education and a commercial general liability policy of at least $300,000. The bill does not provide for regulation by any state entity but does specify that violations of the standards will be treated as a violation of the Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. Contractors are not exempt from these requirements unless their work is within the scope of their license.

This bill also creates a mold assessment certification and a mold remediation certification for contractors who wish to focus on mold inspection or mold remediation that is not incidental to the scope of his or her license. An educational course is required. Certification requirements are established for any person that perform s or directly supervises a mold assessment or for any person that perform s mold remediation.

Download House Bill 315 PDF

To Top


Senate Bill 1012 - Professional Regulations

This bill allows reinstatement of licenses issued by the Department of Business and Professional Regulations or any of its Boards, where they have become delinquent due to illness or unusual hardship. It requires a good faith effort to comply with the license requirements. As presently structured, failure to renew the license puts it in delinquent status. If a licensee fails to renew the license before the expiration of the next license cycle, the license becomes void. There is presently no procedure that perm its DBPR or a professional board to consider hardship or unusual circumstances in a failure to renew a license. This bill will allow reinstatement without having to meet current education standards or to retake an examination.

To Top


House Bill 213 - Liquid Propane, Construction Contracting, and Electronic Filing

This bill expands licensing scopes for different contractors or professionals.

For plumbers, mechanical contractors, and Class A and B air conditioning and heating contractors, the scope of work authorized under their respective licenses has been expanded. Plumbers can now install liquid propane (LP) lines, in addition to natural gas lines. Mechanical contractors also can now install LP lines, in addition to gas lines, in new buildings. Class A and B air conditioning and heating contractors can now disconnect and reconnect LP and natural gas lines when installing replacement air conditioning and heating systems.

For those individuals holding a license or permit for the installation of pre-engineered fire suppression systems, Chapter 489, was amended so that the statute can no longer be interpreted to also require a construction contracting license.

Architects, interior designers, and landscape architects can now electronically sign and seal their plans and documents.

Download House Bill 213 PDF

To Top


House Bill 291 - Certification of Condominium Claims

Two amendments were made to Section 718.301, which generally requires certain procedures for the transfer of control for condominiums from the developer to the association.

First, the revised statute now explicitly holds the developer responsible to the association and its members for all actions taken by the board of administration designated by the developer, until the unit owners have elected a majority of the board.

Second, a new requirement has been imposed on condominium associations bringing claims against developers. Any claims asserted against the developer by a condominium alleging a defect in design, structural elements, construction, mechanical, electrical, fire protection, plumbing, or other element requiring a construction license must be "exam ined and certified by an appropriately licensed Florida engineer, design professional, contractor, or otherwise licensed Florida individual or entity." Presumably the required certification will attest to the legitimacy of the alleged defect, since the revised statute does not indicate exactly what the certification m ust say.

Download House Bill 291 PDF

To Top


House Bill 652 - Revised Public Bond Form.  

The Florida Legislature made revisions to Section 255.05, which requires payment bonds on public construction projects. Two changes were made to the form of public construction bonds:

  1. A space for inserting the bond number is now provided, and
  2. Warning language that any action by any claimant against the bond must be in accordance with the notice and time limitations of Section 255.05(2) is now mandatory.

The Legislature also addressed an issue currently pending before the Florida Supreme Court. Paragraph 4 of Section 255.05 was revised to require that the payment bond provisions of all bonds required by the section be "construed and deemed statutory payment bonds...and such bonds shall not under any circumstances be converted into common law bonds." The clarification will make uniform the application of the time requirements of Section 255.05 to make a claim the bond. Claimants will no longer be able to get longer notice periods by arguing that a public bond became a "common law" bond.

Last, the Legislature also clarified that sureties issuing payment or performance bonds for the construction or maintenance of a building or roadway project are not "insurers" for purposes of the civil remedies provision of Florida law. The civil remedies statute generally imposes a duty on insurance companies to settle claims within policy lim its, in good faith and with due regard to the interests of the insureds. This change was made to deal with a case where a surety company was held liable for bad faith subjecting it to punitive damages. The concern to contractors was whether they would be liable for these dam ages under their indemnity agreement.

To Top

 
Site design and hosting by: